WOBURN - The Planning Board recently backed legislation sponsored by City Council President Richard Haggerty that aims to ban future self-storage facilities from coming to Woburn.

During its last regular meeting in City Hall, the Planning Board unanimously recommended passage of Haggerty’s proposed ordinance, which would eliminate storage warehouses as an allowable use in Woburn’s business interstate, industrial park, and industrial general zoning districts.

According to the city council president, he believes the local market is saturated with storage facilities, at least six of which are currently operating in Woburn. Haggerty contends the business use is not one that generates significant tax revenues or investment, and in fact, he believes an argument could be made that self-storage warehouses hurt the city financially by devaluing the worth of industrial properties.

“There seems to be a trend of turning these industrial buildings into warehouse facilities. I look at our zoning in the city and want to encourage higher-end uses. There’s really no jobs created by these [storage businesses] and they tend to devalue properties, when they’re converted,” said Haggerty.

”If someone owns a building and is going through possible uses … they might spend a great deal of money and time [planning a self-storage development]. I don’t want to send mixed messages,” added Haggerty, when Planner Claudia Leis Bolgen pointed out that rather than enacting a zoning change, the City Council could just deny special permit petitions for self-storage businesses.

In response to a question from Planning Board member David Edmonds, the alderman at-large pointed out the zoning change will not put existing self-storage businesses out-of-business, as they can continue to operate as pre-existing, non-conforming uses.

That legal designation extends to any property or business type in existence before local officials establish zoning rules that render that use illegal. For example, many commercial enterprises, though situated in the middle of single-family housing districts, continue to be operated in those neighborhoods as pre-existing, non-conforming uses.

Making clear his position on self-storage facilities, Haggerty maintains those ventures do have value to Woburn residents and businesses. However, with six of those warehouses already in existence, he believes other types of redevelopments should now be encouraged.

“If someone is moving and needs to put something in storage or if you’re a business bursting at the seams … [having a nearby self-storage business is helpful]. But we have seven of them. I think we have plenty to meet the needs of the community,” said Haggerty.

According to Planning Board member Michael Ventresca, though he generally agrees with Haggerty’s vision, he can recall several instances, such as developments by Olympia Avenue and Kohl’s department store in East Woburn, where plans to convert an industrial property into a self-storage facility made sense.

Characterizing the overall use as “low-impact” in terms of generating new traffic, Ventresca wondered whether the city, in prohibiting future self-storage developments, would lose a valuable alternative for industrial buildings bordering residential neighborhoods or high-traffic corridors.

Haggerty, pointing out that many residential abutters are less than happy with the proliferation of storage warehouses in their neighborhoods, conceded the business use is fairly benign. However, he believes industrial properties could still be thoughtfully redeveloped in a way that both minimizes disruptions to abutters and maximizes better investment opportunities for the city.

“If you talked to some residents in those areas, they might see [those businesses] differently than you or I. I would agree with you that it’s a low-traffic [generator]. That’s why we allowed the last one to go in by Olympia Avenue,” Haggerty responded.

“But that [property on Olympia Avenue] is a 28,000-square-foot building, and most of it will become storage. Each [of our other self-storage businesses] are well in excess of 50,000 square feet,” he continued. “Certainly along Washington Street, that seemed appropriate, but I’m hoping we can find other low-impact uses that can generate better tax revenues and more jobs,,” said Planner Claudia Leis Bolgen

(6) comments


I think that a lot of people would have something to say about that ban, especially the people who are live and work in the states that are constantly trying to build up more warehouse storage space for their distribution centres! I'm glad that storage prices inner west are affordable enough and that we have sufficient facility for people in the area that we don't have to worry about any such restriction on us just yet!


The self-storage facilities are very important nowadays, they are a step to progress and for a better area development. This concept means that you will have a small space away from home where you can store almost anything that you want in. There are areas where these units are common, like the self storage rohnert park. People like this modern storage solution and more people should try such services.


I can understand where the council is going here with the self storage industry and even though I don't fully agree with what he's proposing, I can see that there's some sense to it all. At the end of the day, you don't want to have a dozen and one self storage companies that will confuse consumers to the options for self storage services in the area I think!


As an owner of a self storage facility in Sydney, it’s upsetting to hear of a council that's intending to ban self storage units entirely from the area. I mean, I can understand that they are getting a lot of people moving into this particular industry there, but why shouldn't there be such services available if the demand allows for it? At the end of the day, if the businesses are not sustainable, they will close shop and leave of their own accord. Why should the government seek to restrict them from the get-go?


If the market for storage solutions in the area is already saturated, perhaps it's a good idea to restrict the number of similar businesses moving forward? I don't think that the storage industry inherently is bad, but it will choke out good competition and efficiency if it's not managed and everybody is trying to swarm the area with their services at one go!


Usually where there is demand, there ought to be supply and in this town, it definitely seems that self storage is the popular commodity since at least six facilities are currently opening. However, when there is just too much, it needs to stop somewhere. Too much of a particular resource might just prove to be redundant especially when it does not generate significant taxes and investments.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.