Town Crier

WILMINGTON/TEWKSBURY — On Friday, July 10, the Massachusetts De­partment of Public Health rescinded the order banning the use of reusable bags for shopping. The ban, put in place as part of COVID-19 safety measures by the Massachusetts De­partment of Public Health on March 25, instructed grocery stores and pharmacies not to bag items using reusable shopping bags, and instead use only paper or single-use plastic bags.

The restriction on the use of reusable bags during the pandemic was met with controversy, however. In the early days and weeks of the pandemic, scientists were still learning how the virus spread. Surface contamination was as much a suspect as was airborne transmission. While some reports stated that the virus could live for up to three days on plastic, others found no link between reusable bags and contracting the virus.

There has since been evidence the plastics industry influenced such guidance. Of note, a letter from the Plastics Industry Associa­tion to HHS Secretary Alex Azar published by Politico claims that single use plastic bags are the “safest choice” during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmen­tal activists see this as an opportunistic play by the industry to fight back against single use plastic bag bans. Known as disaster capitalism, the move has been criticized for using one public health crisis to exploit another.

A scientific report published June 8 in Environ­mental Science and Tech­nology evaluated the studies cited by the plastics industry, finding that “Im­portantly, none of the three studies investigated the presence, survival, or in­fec­tivity of any coronavirus family members (e.g., SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)).”

In other words, it was not an apples-to-apples comparison. The report, au­thor­­ed by R. C. Hale and B. Song of the Virginia Insti­tute of Marine Science, William and Mary, and made available through the American Chemical Society, indicates that in grocery stores, person to person contact and person to surface contact, such as via door handles or shopping carts, are more likely to be a source of transmission of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) “than infrequently handled reusable grocery bags.”

When news that reusable bags could again be used by consumers was announ­ced, word spread quickly throughout the Common­wealth. While stores may be granted time locally to use up their stock of single use plastic bags, bans that were in place prior to the emergency order are now back in effect.

According to Brad Ver­ter, founder of the Mass Green Network, via e­mail, “As of this writing, over 130 municipalities in Massachu­setts have passed regulations to limit plastic bags, and more are in the works. We are all gratified to see the Commonwealth back on track to reduce plastic waste.”

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.