Town Crier

TEWKSBURY — The planning board met April 1 to review zoning articles for Town Meeting and hold permit hearings. Two hearings, one regarding a special permit and definitive subdivision at 1420 Andover St. and the other concerning a site plan special permit at 1037 North St./1547 Andover St./1553 Andover St./1563 Ando­ver St., were continued to la­ter meetings.

The board accepted Win­terberry Lane as a street and approved a special permit extension request at 1 Radcliffe Road for parking. L3 Corporation is now occupying the space and may need to expand parking in the future.

The board addressed lighting issues at Walgreens on Route 38. Abutters on South Street raised concerns about light pollution following LED lighting upgrades and degraded protective landscaping. According to assistant town manager Steve Sadwick, the town paid for an independent study and found no light spillage, but residents were not satisfied.

The town is contacting the lighting contractor to see if shields can be placed on the lights. Landscaping chan­ges Walgreens could make, in­cluding planting “Green Gi­ant” arborvitaes and 50 trees, 10 feet tall were discussed. A landscape change approval was granted from the original plan approved in 1998. The board will continue to work on the matter on behalf of the residents.

The board approved a fa­mi­ly suite special permit at 25 Kearsage St.

The board conducted a zoning article review in ad­vance of Town Meeting.

“The warrant may reflect the numbers being slightly different but the language will be consistent,” said chair Steve Johnson.

Article 35 was brought forward by the Board of Sel­ect­men “to see if the town will vote to amend the Tewks­bury zoning bylaw... to al­low for off-premises signs, electronic message boards, and billboards along interstate highways according to state and federal regulations.”

Sadwick stated that the article is a direct copy of the article submitted at last year’s Town Meeting. He al­so noted that the article does not apply to Route 38, only Interstate 93.

“The economic benefit to the town is potentially significant over the course of the time the billboards are there,” said Johnson. “If we don’t do it, one of our neighbors is going to, and they’re going to be the ones reaping the money.”

Sadwick explained that “dur­ing the permitting pro­cess a development agreement is reached with the billboard provider,” and mentioned that the town of Stone­ham will receive $50,000 a year over a 20-year period from a billboard in a parking lot.

One resident asked where those potential funds would be designated; Sadwick said that such details are typically negotiated as part of the development agreement. Johnson noted that there will be constraints on the number and locations of potential billboards, and Sad­wick said that with state regulations and codes, there would be about 10 possible locations, though the actual number of boards installed would probably be closer to two or three.

The board recommended adoption of the article at an­nual Town Meeting on May 6.

The board looked at Article 36, “to see if the town will vote to change the Town of Tewksbury’s zoning assessor’s map 10 lot 36 at 15 Kit­tredge Ave. from Heavy In­dustrial to Heavy Industrial 1.”

Developer Jim Andella and his attorney Dave Plunkett came before the board to discuss the article. The 1.87 acre parcel is an “isolated location” abutted by Pen­ney’s Junkyard and Walmart.

“There is an opportunity for businesses who do automotive repair,” said Plun­kett. “It makes sense that this is not along Route 38.”

The board noted that the article only changes the zoning and that potential developments still have to come before the board. The board recommended adoption of Article 36.

Article 37 and 38 are to change the zoning at 118 Lumber Lane and 120 Lum­ber Lane from Heavy In­dus­trial to Heavy Industrial 1. The board recommended adoption of both articles.

The board addressed Ar­ticle 39. The petitioner of the article sent a letter to the board informing them of their intent to withdraw the article without prejudice; thusly, the board recommended withdrawal of the article. The petitioner must now appear at Town Meet­ing on May 6 to formally withdraw the article. If the petitioner does not withdraw the article, the board recommends denial.

The issue in question was a proposed zoning change from residential to office/research for five lots on Vale Street along Route 93. Sev­eral residents appeared and were concerned but were assured by the board that the article was being withdrawn by the petitioner.

The board recommended adoption of Article 40, which changes the zoning at 1600 Main St. from multi-family to commercial.

Article 41 changes zoning to allow for multi-family dwel­ling zone in an office re­search district in the Ando­ver Street area. Board member Eric Ryder opposed the change, citing concerns about drug problems at Ames Pond, overextension of police and fire services, and an influx of students in the district.

“We do not need another group of apartments... I would rather let that sit there for another 13 years than put another 50, 60 apartments there,” he said, “and I think you’re impacting this town in a negative manner.”

Johnson mentioned that any project that would po­tentially go on the land would still have to take the board’s input and gain its approval.

“It’s not by right,” he said. “Just because you can do it doesn’t mean you’re going to be able to do it.”

Ryder proposed that the board vote to make no recommendation on the article, while board member Vinny Fratalia proposed that the board vote to recommend to adopt the article. Ryder and member Robert Fowler vo­ted to make no recommendation, while Johnson, Fra­talia, and member Jay Dela­ney voted against.

Fratalia’s proposal to recommend to adopt garnered yes votes from Fratalia, John­son, and Delaney, while Ryder and Fowler voted against.

Andy Street of Civil De­sign Consultants came be­fore the board representing BTCOG and John Faneros on the ongoing matter of a site plan special permit at 2131 Main St. The project is designed for 16 residential units. The board echoed their previous concerns about traffic on Route 38, having suggested installing a turn lane. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation concluded that a turn lane would not be warranted.

Several residents spoke in opposition of the project. Johnson mentioned that the developer has come before the board five times.

“We go through however many meetings it takes to get to an endpoint... but we still had some issues... we waited and we got the answers,” he said about development hear­ings in general.

Johnson, Delaney, and Fra­talia voted to approve the special permit, while Fowler and Ryder voted against it. The permit was denied. The next meeting of the board is scheduled for April 22, 2019.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.