Town Crier

WILMINGTON — On Tuesday night, the Plan­ning Board continued several public hearings re­garding construction site plan reviews and special permits before disagreement in the public hearing for 66 Industrial Way en­sued.

Their first item was continuing the public hearing for a conservation subdivision design special permit at 79 Nichols St., which was further continued to their meeting on Sept. 1. The pre­senter, Jill Elm­strom, wanted to make sure there would be enough time to complete and return the final design revision.

The board next continued the public hearing for the site plan review, stormwater management, and par­king relief special permit for 330 Ballardvale St. Di­rector of Planning and Conservation Valerie Ging­rich established that the applicant should resubmit two applications now that they’re adding on the par­king lot changes for the abutting property that they’re trying to purchase.

This was continued to 7:40 p.m. on Aug. 4.

For the site plan review and stormwater management permit at 100 Eames St., the board approved the request to extend the public hearing to Aug. 4 at 7:45 p.m. and extend their ac­tion deadline to Aug. 31.

The board then voted to approve Form A for 48 Chestnut St. and 46 Tow­path Dr. in their time be­fore the next appointment. Gingrich also reported from the annual Town Meeting that the feasibility studies for both a new senior center and a new town hall were approved.

After Gingrich explained that the request to en­dorse the corrected sheet 4 for a definitive subdivision at Highland Estates is merely a shifting of the lot line, the board ap­proved this request.

While they were mostly in favor of the application for a sign special permit for 196 Ballardvale St., the board agreed to save the vote for their next meeting and end the public hearing.

Applicant Adam Quinn is developing a new burger place, Habit Burger, on the property. He is also the current franchise owner of the Dunkin’ at 362 Middle­sex Ave.

It was then that 66 In­dustrial Way came up for its continued public hearing. In summary, Gingrich explained that the applicant wants to move the water and sewer lines of the abutting parcel, and a previous condition for ap­proval read that the board required a letter of ac­knowledgment from the adjacent landowner.

“Instead of requiring the acknowledgement letter, [what town counsel recommends] we should do is ask that the applicant provide proof of notification,” she suggested to the board.

Presenter Michael Field clarified that the proposed moving of water and sew­er lines benefits the adjacent property, and they would take the responsibility for any break or blockage that’s their fault. He also asked the board also waive the condition for an easement deed after work is completed (condition 6).

Resident Peter Sutton called in to claim the landowners should be able to decide whether their pipes are moved — and they have not agreed.

“Instead of waiving condition 6, they should have to get the easement before they can touch our pipes,” he added.

He also agreed in theory with establishing a bond from the applicant in case of a break or blockage as recommended by Chair­man Michael Sorrentino, later suggesting the bond should last as long as the applicant owns the property.

This encouraged the ap­plicant, Mike Cronin, to clarify that pavement won’t be put over the proposed relocated pipes and instead they’ll use concrete pavers.

“These engineering de­tails on the plan are ac­cepted in the industry,” he said.

Sutton returned that the applicant would only be responsible for the maintenance, repair, and re­placement of drainage structures as they continued talking about who would be responsible for what kind of pipe issue. Field added that the proposed new pipes would be better than what the abutter currently has and won’t frustrate the purpose of the easement.

Sorrentino maintained the board would not vote on the easement part of the approved proposal, as it seemed that the issue would have to be resolved in land court. The board agreed to draft a new condition 5 regarding proof of notification by the applicant instead of acknowledgment from the abutter and that Gingrich would discuss condition 6 with town counsel.

The public hearing was continued to Aug. 4 at 8 p.m. with the action deadline extended to the end of August. In the meantime, Field pledged to continuing to try to work out the easement agreement with the adjacent landowner.

After that, in Board of Appeals cases, they appro­ved a special permit for the possession, storing, use, and distribution of ra­dioactive material in very small amounts (fractions of an ounce) at 25 Upton Dr. They also approved the 12 Shawsheen Ave. case regarding filling in an area in the flood plain district.

The final item under Board of Appeals regarded a development at Mid­dlesex Avenue and Jef­ferson Road, which Ging­rich explained is still in the middle of several re­views. The board discussed concerns they hope would be addressed in a future plan, like eliminating vertical elements of the elevation and raising the site for groundwater separation.

The next Planning Board meeting will start at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 4.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.